Leder du efter amerikanske priser?
Vis priser i USA
1
24
Build advice

Home Server Buld

I was hoping you could give me your thoughts on the compatibility and functionality of the parts. I am mainly gonna use it for Simulation running and light 3D modeling in Solidworks. I will add a GPU later and i'll upgrade the CPU in the future.

  • keyboard_arrow_up

    FINALLLL

    • Ryzen 7 8700G
    • 16 GB
    • 1 TB
    • ATX
    • 750 W
1

Sort replies:

1
1012

I would not spend nearly that much on a motherboard, what do you need that for? A motherboard for 2000 sek should be enough. I would get significantly faster ram though, and also 32 gb. I dont know how much performance you need for those programs though, so I can’t say which cpu you should get.

  • keyboard_arrow_up

    Systemless Stag Beetle

    • Ryzen 7 8700G
    • 32 GB
    • 1 TB
    • ATX
    • 750 W
1
1
24
edited

Bro i need the mobo to be futureproof and im planning on using internal graphics. But when i do get the chance ill get a cheap but good gpu. THIS IS NOT FOR GAMING. It also needs to have USB thunderbolt for fast usb c data transfering. I need the motherboard to be extremley solid until 2028.

1
1
1012

I get that it’s not for gaming but 7000 sek for a motherboard seems very overkill to me. Especially considering that the other parts are pretty ”budget”. The motherboard I chose will definantly last more than 3 years.

1
1
24
edited

Look man, I need a board that has thunderbolt headers as i can add a thunderbolt extension later. I need to use all the advantages of thunderbolt. I also need it to be future proof to a level that it may be able to support midrange to highend cpus until atleast 2030. The motherboard i chose is super high end and will last for a very long time. As the mobo of a pc is like the base of the whole setup i need it to be solid for a very long time. I WILL UPGRADE THE PARTS LATER MY CPU IS NOT BUDGET, IT'S ONE OF THE BEST FOR SERVER BUILDS BUT I'LL UPGRADE IT WHEN I GET A GPU, I NEED IT FOR INTERNAL GRAPHICS!!!!! Advantages of my mobo over yours, The ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero and the MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi are both high-quality motherboards, but they cater to different segments and have distinct features. Here's a comparison of the advantages of the ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero over the MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi:

  1. Chipset and Platform

ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: It uses the X670E chipset, which offers more robust power delivery and better PCIe 5.0 support. The X670E chipset is designed for top-tier performance, overclocking, and next-gen features. It’s perfect for enthusiasts and those who want to maximize their system's performance. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: Uses the B650 chipset, which is more budget-friendly and offers slightly fewer features. While it also supports PCIe 5.0, the B650 chipset doesn’t offer the same high-end overclocking potential as the X670E. 2. PCIe 5.0 Support ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: Fully supports PCIe 5.0 for both GPU and storage, ensuring future-proofing for high-end GPUs and blazing-fast storage devices. The PCIe 5.0 lanes give more bandwidth, making it ideal for the most demanding tasks. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: Only supports PCIe 5.0 for storage, but not for GPUs. This limits the potential for future upgrades in GPU technology. 3. Power Delivery and VRM ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: It features a premium 18+2 power stage VRM design with high-end cooling for consistent power delivery, making it better suited for overclocking and pushing the limits of your CPU. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: While it has a good power delivery system, it’s not on the same level as the ASUS X670E Hero. It has fewer phases and isn’t designed for extreme overclocking. 4. Memory Support ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: Supports faster memory speeds (DDR5 overclocking up to ~6400 MHz or higher, depending on the kit), which is a great advantage for building high-performance systems, especially for gaming or heavy multitasking. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: Has good memory support as well, but the overall overclocking headroom is more limited compared to the X670E Hero. 5. Expansion and Connectivity ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: Offers more I/O ports, including Thunderbolt 4, additional USB ports, and more SATA and M.2 slots. It also provides better networking options, including 10Gb Ethernet, making it ideal for heavy-duty tasks and networking-heavy applications. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: Has solid connectivity options (Wi-Fi 6E, 2.5Gb Ethernet), but it doesn't come close to the extensive feature set of the ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero. 6. Build Quality and Aesthetics ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: Known for its premium build quality, superior components, and customizability. The motherboard features RGB lighting, sleek design, and a robust cooling solution for critical components, making it a visually appealing choice for high-end builds. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: While it has a solid build quality, it doesn't reach the same level of refinement and high-end aesthetics of the ROG Hero series. 7. Additional Features ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: Comes with Wi-Fi 6E, more USB ports, USB-C, and AI-powered features for system tuning. It also provides Q-Code, debug LEDs, and other enthusiast-friendly tools. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: Also includes Wi-Fi 6E, but with fewer premium features and tuning options compared to the ROG Crosshair. 8. Target Audience ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero: Aimed at enthusiasts, overclockers, and gamers who want the best performance and future-proofing. This motherboard is built for those who want to extract every bit of performance from their CPU and components. MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi: More suited for users who are looking for high performance at a more affordable price, but with fewer advanced features and customization options. Conclusion The ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero excels with its superior chipset, power delivery system, higher PCIe 5.0 support, and overall more premium features, making it a better choice for enthusiasts, overclockers, and those looking for top-tier performance and future-proofing. On the other hand, the MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi is a solid, cost-effective motherboard with good features for users who don’t need the extreme performance or premium features that come with the X670E Hero. But I do.

1
1
1497

I didnt go to komponentkoll to read the bible twice

1
1
24
edited

my bad i just wrote down everything that i know. it turns out i know a lot.

1
1
1497

In the beggining. God made the Gpu and the Cpu.

1
1
24

wdym?

1
1
1497

That motherboard he choose will last until 2030

1
1
24
edited

thankk you bro thats what im planning.

1
1
1497

This one is MUCH better. What gpu are you going to add?

  • keyboard_arrow_up

    Moire Siberian

    • Ryzen 9 7900
    • 64 GB
    • 2 TB
    • ATX
    • 850 W
1
1
24

Bro i need the mobo to be futureproof and im planinng on using internal graphics. But when i do get the chance ill get a cheap but good gpu. THIS IS NOT FOR GAMING.

1
1
1497

That mobo is maybe 3% better than the one i choose. 3D rendering takes alot of gpu power and you should get a deticated gpu. Not Integraded graphics. Get a used nvidia gpu for 2000kr

1
1
24

bro i mentioned in the description that im gonna use this for light 3d modeling on solidworks not 3d rendering

1
1
1497

The pc i have does include integraded graphics

1
1
24

The ryzen 9 7900 does not have integrted graphics

1
1
1497
edited

Yes it does, Radeon graphics. Those cpus without have an F in the end. Like the 5 7500f

1
1
24
edited

No, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 does not have integrated graphics.

The Ryzen 9 7900 is part of AMD's Ryzen 7000-series processors, and it is a CPU without integrated graphics. If you need integrated graphics, you would need to look at AMD's APU series, such as the Ryzen 7000G series (like the Ryzen 7 7700G), which comes with built-in AMD Radeon Vega graphics. it also is way above my price range of 15000 sek

1
2
1497

Good god it has integrated graphics just not good ones.

2
1
1012

8000-series integrated graphics is much better though. Still, I do think that it’s usually a better to buy 7000-series with a cheap dedicated gpu.

1
1
24

Yes, the 8000g seires are dedicated for internal graphics

1
1
1497

The 7000 series still have them

1
1
1012

Yeah, but they can’t really do much more than browsing the internet.

1
1
1497

True, but saving some money when he will buy a deticated gpu would be good

1
1
24

no i wont be saving money and the 7000 series does not have internal graphics. Only the ones with G in them do.

1